What I learned from the UN’s “AI for Good” summit

The convention featured a number of robots (together with one which dispenses wine), however what I preferred most of all was the way it managed to convene individuals working in AI from across the globe, that includes audio system from China, the Center East, and Africa too, resembling Pelonomi Moiloa, the CEO of Lelapa AI, a startup constructing AI for African languages. AI will be very US-centric and male dominated, and any effort to make the dialog extra international and numerous is laudable. 

However actually, I didn’t depart the convention feeling assured AI was going to play a significant function in advancing any of the UN targets. Actually, essentially the most fascinating speeches have been about how AI is doing the alternative. Sage Lenier, a local weather activist, talked about how we should not let AI speed up environmental destruction. Tristan Harris, the cofounder of the Heart for Humane Expertise, gave a compelling speak connecting the dots between our habit to social media, the tech sector’s monetary incentives, and our failure to be taught from earlier tech booms. And there are nonetheless deeply ingrained gender biases in tech, Mia Shah-Dand, the founding father of Ladies in AI Ethics, reminded us. 

So whereas the convention itself was about utilizing AI for “good,” I’d have preferred to see extra discuss how elevated transparency, accountability, and inclusion might make AI itself good from growth to deployment.

We now know that producing one picture with generative AI makes use of as a lot power as charging a smartphone. I’d have preferred extra trustworthy conversations about how you can make the know-how extra sustainable itself in an effort to meet local weather targets. And it felt jarring to listen to discussions about how AI can be utilized to assist cut back inequalities after we know that so lots of the AI methods we use are constructed on the backs of human content material moderators within the International South who sift via traumatizing content material whereas being paid peanuts. 

Making the case for the “great profit” of AI was OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman, the star speaker of the summit. Altman was interviewed remotely by Nicholas Thompson, the CEO of the Atlantic, which has by the way simply introduced a deal for OpenAI to share its content material to coach new AI fashions. OpenAI is the firm that instigated the present AI growth, and it might have been an amazing alternative to ask him about all these points. As a substitute, the 2 had a comparatively imprecise, high-level dialogue about security, leaving the viewers none the wiser about what precisely OpenAI is doing to make their methods safer. It appeared they have been merely presupposed to take Altman’s phrase for it. 

Altman’s speak got here per week or so after Helen Toner, a researcher on the Georgetown Heart for Safety and Rising Expertise and a former OpenAI board member, mentioned in an interview that the board discovered in regards to the launch of ChatGPT via Twitter, and that Altman had on a number of events given the board inaccurate details about the corporate’s formal security processes. She has additionally argued that it’s a unhealthy thought to let AI companies govern themselves, as a result of the immense revenue incentives will all the time win. (Altman mentioned he “disagree[s] together with her recollection of occasions.”) 

When Thompson requested Altman what the primary good factor to come back out of generative AI can be, Altman talked about productiveness, citing examples resembling software program builders who can use AI instruments to do their work a lot sooner. “We’ll see totally different industries turn out to be way more productive than they was as a result of they will use these instruments. And that can have a optimistic influence on every part,” he mentioned. I believe the jury remains to be out on that one. 


Deeper Studying

Why Google’s AI Overviews will get issues flawed

Leave a Comment